The 2016 US Presidential Election - Not Your Typical Year

Published on 19 Apr, 2016

The 2016 US Presidential Election - Not Your Typical Year

Any major economic or political event in the US, especially one that is recurring, is bound to be tested for its impact on the stock market.

And as far as big events go, there are few as big and closely followed as the US Presidential elections.

Given the importance of the event, the Internet’s already abuzz with speculation. There has always existed a fairly evident cyclicality between the stock market’s performance in the US and its four-year Presidential term.

While each presidential cycle would typically have its own set of unique circumstances and economic indications, over the past 116 years (period considered for analysis in this note) the latter part of a presidential term has been favorable for stock prices. We observe that policy decisions necessary for improved economic activity and growth typically occur during the first half of a presidential term.

While the net impact of these decisions are meant to be positive, they could still imply higher taxes, increased regulation, and tighter controls. As such, they may not bode well for corporate profit expectations.

As a President approaches the latter part of his term, policies tend to favor the electorate. Harsher measures are unlikely to be put in place. Of course, external global factors would still play a role in determining which way the stock market moves. A case in point is the recent global recession of 2008, where despite being the last year of a US presidency, the Dow Jones lost 34% of its value led by the sub-prime crisis and a near freeze on global financial markets.

Having stated the average US stock market behaviour driven by the US presidential cycle, we believe the 2016 election year would break away from the trend. While there are a few noteworthy common traits that suggest 2016 shouldn’t stray from the norm, there are some clear emerging trends that, in our view, could defy it.

The Two Sides of the US Political System

Before we illustrate our findings, here’s an overview of the US political system with respects to its two oldest parties, i.e. the Democratic Party (est. 1828) and the Republican Party (est. 1854).

Since the beginning of the 20th century, both parties have shared the presidency almost equally, 15 for the Republicans and 14 for the Democrats.

Spread Of US Presidential Rule – Democrats and Republicans

Policy-wise and on key issues, both parties differ markedly.

While Democrats are more liberal and progressive, the Republicans tow a conservative and traditionalistic line.

Here is how they compare on some of the most debated issues in the US.

Comparison on Major Policy Issues

Both parties have been diametrically opposite on some very contentious issues in recent US political and economic debates however, some of which include calls for tighter gun control after a spate of civilian gun shooting incidents, issues related to immigration especially with the mass exodus of Syrian refugees currently taking place in the Middle East, and government spending on healthcare. Looking at the above comparison, one can understand the strong rhetoric used by the current Republican hopeful Donald Trump with respect to gun control and immigration.

Some of the more prominent candidates for the nomination of the 2016 US Presidential election include Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio from the Republican Party. The Democrats have Bernie Sanders and former First Lady and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as two of their main candidates.

Presidential Terms and the US Stock Market’s Cyclicality

Coming back to the impact of a Presidential term on the stock markets, our empirical analysis backs the view that — historically — the second half of the four year period has been stronger on average.

Average Annual DJIA Performance

The Dow Jones Industrial Average has returned, on average, nearly 12% and 7% in Year 3 and Year 4 respectively over the past 29 Presidential terms. The economy has also performed comparatively better on average in that period, which, in our view, reflects the impact of the measures that the governments usually put in place during the first half. It’s also worth noting that, historically, a majority of corporate tax increases have occurred during the first half, while a majority of the corporate tax cuts have occurred during the second half.

Tax Increases and Tax Cuts

Another interesting anecdote to note is that the US stock market, in an election year, has gained (on average) its highest when the incumbent President is not running for a re-election. This is the case in 2016, with the current President Barack Obama having already served his second consecutive term at the White House.

Average DJIA Performance in Election terms

Here’s Why 2016 Won’t Be a Typical Election Year for the US Markets

While there are a few historical trends that suggest why 2016 could differ from the usual cycle, there are some new and emerging trends that appear more convincing. But first, let’s see what history has taught us.

Historically, the US stock market (on average) has under performed by over 900 bps in an election year when a Democrat is in the White House as compared to when a Republican is an incumbent.

We also note the effect of the January cycle. It has been widely prescribed that the US stock market’s performance in the month of January is a very strong indicator of how the rest of the year pans out. We extrapolate this hypothesis onto election years over the past 116 years and note that out of the last 28 Presidential cycles, there have been 14 instances where the DJIA saw a decline in January of which 65% of the times, the full-year returns were also negative.

Democrats v/s Republicans Performances

The year 2016 saw the DJIA fall by over 5% in the month of January. Over the past 115 years, over 60% of the time, January’s performance has been an accurate indicator of how the entire year would settle.

The World Is a Different Playground Now

While we’ve noticed a few trends in history that suggest 2016 will defy the norm, the fundamentally different global economic scenario that the current election year is encountering could make a huge difference.

The biggest game changing factor of all, in our opinion, is China.

The Asian economy now contributes almost 16% to global GDP and is the second largest in the world. US’ trade deficit with China has increased nearly 5x over the past decade and a half alone. Therefore, China’s rapid economic slowdown is likely to build pressure in 2016.

US Economy and China Economy

The current oil price dynamic also has no precedent.

Oil prices have lost almost 70% of their value since the mid-2014. As much as the tepid global economic growth scenario has a role to play, the ongoing geo-political crisis has exacerbated the fall. Some might argue that $30/barrel is pretty much the floor; volatility on the way up could still keep US markets on the edge in 2016. Only three times in last 116 years has the price of oil dropped as much or more in the year preceding an election year.

Finally, the US dollar has seen significant gains in the past 12-15 months and could also put some pressure on overall economic growth in the US. A strong American Dollar makes US goods more expensive in foreign markets, leading to a negative impact on the US’ overall trade balance. 2016 could also see a much more definitive move up in the Fed fund rates, putting further pressure on US equities.

Oil price Movement in Year preceding an Election Year

We also note that 2015 saw the dollar index increase by almost 10%, among the highest gains any year has seen going into the election year. Our analysis suggests that over the past 50 years, the dollar index and the Dow Jones Industrial Average have an inverse correlation of 48% suggesting that a strengthening dollar, going into 2016, has a good chance of keeping the equity market under check.

Valuation doesn’t seem to be in favour of the US equity market either.

The S&P 500, adjusted for inflation and cyclicality, is trading at near all-time high levels, excluding the technology bubble seen at the start of the last decade.

S&P500 and Dollar Index v/s DJIA

We, therefore, believe it would be unwise to position one’s portfolio towards US equities purely on the basis of the US market’s cyclicality with Presidential election years. There are clearly more than a few factors that are likely to be headwinds for the market. The ongoing Presidential campaigns and debates too have been rather vague and uninspiring, leading to more scepticism. We believe US’ safe haven tag and lack of alternatives for equity investments elsewhere globally are the two key factors that are likely to extend support to the market.


Speak your Mind